You think that pointing out that it makes more sense to trust the judgement of tens if not hundreds of professionals / forensic analysts over one guy on youtube is fallacious reasoning? I could understand that if you thought we were on a debate platform that it would make some kind of sense for you to point out that you understand what a logical fallacy means, but in no way whatsoever does it represent common sense and basic reasoning.
I'd like to see you try and convince me that it isn't common sense or basic knowledge that professionals that dedicate their lives to studying crime scences would have a better idea of how to investigate a crime scene over one guy that wasn't on the scene that is strictly using audio he found over the internet. Tell me where the fallacious reasoning is there please, enlighten me.