Author: Hollow <jkfdsa>     Reply to Message
Date: 7/6/2016 3:25:57 AM
Subject: RE: A question for Republicans

Clearly you didn't read all of it. Just the few sentences that try to prove your point. Same thing her and the rest of the Dems will do. I still wouldn't call her a criminal genius but her years in politics and dealing with Bill's scandals, have equipped her to cover up and deny with the best of them. The fact that a Chicago politician, the most corrupt people in the U.S., has her back is all I need to say fuck no.

"For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails)."

"With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account."
_